| | | | | | |

Core i5-4570 vs i5-3340M


Description
The i5-4570 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4570 gets a score of 124.4 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4570 is 2 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
306a9
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
84 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
43.56k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.61k points
62.75k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4570
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.13k
11.51k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
12.02k
11.13k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
4.4k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
4.55k (x0.98)
TOTAL
34.8k
31.58k (x0.91)

Multithread

i5-4570

i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
49.75k
22.59k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
45.72k
25.49k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.93k
10.42k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
4.25k (x0.47)
TOTAL
124.44k
62.75k (x0.5)

Performance/W
i5-4570
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
592 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
544 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
1481 points/W
1793 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4570
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3648 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3340 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1388 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1292 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
9668 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4