| | | | | | |

Core i5-4460 vs m3-7Y30


Description
The i5-4460 is based on Haswell architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 140.3 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4460 is 2.7 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
84 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2014
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
39.53k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.27k points
52.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4460
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
19.84k
10.02k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
10.86k
9.22k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
2.04k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
4.31k (x0.98)
TOTAL
39.53k
25.6k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-4460

m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
75.08k
21.75k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
42.36k
20.51k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
4.97k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.45k
5.56k (x0.86)
TOTAL
140.27k
52.78k (x0.38)

Performance/W
i5-4460
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
894 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
504 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
195 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
1670 points/W
11730 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4460
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
5834 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3193 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1290 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
11628 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4