| | | | | | |

Core i5-4460 vs i5-3340M


Description
The i5-4460 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4460 gets a score of 112.4 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4460 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
306a9
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
84 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2014
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
39.53k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.27k points
62.75k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-4460
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.12k
11.51k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
10.69k
11.13k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
4.4k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
4.55k (x1.17)
TOTAL
31.39k
31.58k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-4460

i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
45.75k
22.59k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
42.71k
25.49k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.81k
10.42k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.25k (x0.7)
TOTAL
112.35k
62.75k (x0.56)

Performance/W
i5-4460
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
545 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
508 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
1338 points/W
1793 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4460
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3565 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3143 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1385 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1139 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
9232 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4