| | | | | | |

Core i5-4440 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4


Description
The i5-4440 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4440 gets a score of 138.7 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 8.4 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
14/28
TDP
84 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
35840 kB
Date
June 2013
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
138.69k points
1162.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4440
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.08k
17.8k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
16.51k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.47k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
2.56k (x0.61)
TOTAL
38.29k
41.35k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-4440

E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
73.26k
494.82k (x6.75)
Test#2 (FP)
41.01k
514.13k (x12.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
132.87k (x7.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
20.8k (x2.85)
TOTAL
138.69k
1162.63k (x8.38)

Performance/W
i5-4440
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
872 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
488 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
204 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
1651 points/W
9689 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4440
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3174 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1275 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
11604 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4