| | | | | | |

Core i5-4440 vs i5-10210U


Description
The i5-4440 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4440 gets a score of 138.7 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ec
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
84 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2013
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
138.69k points
145.51k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4440
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.08k
23.11k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
20.58k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.73k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
7.43k (x1.77)
TOTAL
38.29k
55.86k (x1.46)

Multithread

i5-4440

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.26k
65.84k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
41.01k
60.77k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
14.45k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
4.44k (x0.61)
TOTAL
138.69k
145.51k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i5-4440
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
872 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
488 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
204 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
1651 points/W
9701 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4440
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3174 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1275 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
11604 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4