| | | | | | |

Core i5-4440 vs i3-10100


Description
The i5-4440 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4440 gets a score of 138.7 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
138.69k points
162.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4440
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
19.08k
22.74k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
20.31k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.71k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
7.65k (x1.82)
TOTAL
38.29k
55.41k (x1.45)

Multithread

i5-4440

i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
73.26k
71.95k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
41.01k
67.7k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
16.43k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
6.25k (x0.86)
TOTAL
138.69k
162.33k (x1.17)

Performance/W
i5-4440
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
872 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
488 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
204 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
1651 points/W
2497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4440
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3174 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1275 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
11604 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4