Core i5-4300U vs m3-7Y30
Description
The i5-4300U is based on Haswell architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4300U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4300U is 1.2 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4300U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4300U is 1.2 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
32.18k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.79k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4300U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
16.54k
10.02k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
8.71k
9.22k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.69k
2.04k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
4.31k (x1.33)
TOTAL
32.18k
25.6k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-4300U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
31.64k
21.75k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
20.51k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.46k
4.97k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
5.56k (x1.8)
TOTAL
64.79k
52.78k (x0.81)
Performance/W
i5-4300U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
2110 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1439 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
564 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
4319 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4300U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
5705 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3003 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1116 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
11097 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4