Core i5-4278U vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The i5-4278U is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4278U gets a score of 76.2 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 15.3 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4278U gets a score of 76.2 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 15.3 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
14/28
TDP
28 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
35840 kB
Date
July 2014
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
34.55k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.18k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4278U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.58k
17.8k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
9.35k
16.51k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.47k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.64k
2.56k (x0.7)
TOTAL
34.55k
41.35k (x1.2)
Multithread
i5-4278U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
494.82k (x12.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
514.13k (x22.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10k
132.87k (x13.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
20.8k (x4.47)
TOTAL
76.18k
1162.63k (x15.26)
Performance/W
i5-4278U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1373 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
824 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
2721 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4278U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5670 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3015 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
11145 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4