Core i5-4278U vs i5-10210U
Description
The i5-4278U is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4278U gets a score of 76.2 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.9 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4278U gets a score of 76.2 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.9 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
806ec
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2014
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
34.55k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.18k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4278U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.58k
23.11k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
9.35k
20.58k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.73k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.64k
7.43k (x2.04)
TOTAL
34.55k
55.86k (x1.62)
Multithread
i5-4278U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
65.84k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
60.77k (x2.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10k
14.45k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
4.44k (x0.96)
TOTAL
76.18k
145.51k (x1.91)
Performance/W
i5-4278U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1373 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
824 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
2721 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4278U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5670 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3015 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
11145 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4