Core i5-4278U vs i3-10110U
Description
The i5-4278U is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4278U gets a score of 76.2 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4278U gets a score of 76.2 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
806ec
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
34.55k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.18k points
106.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4278U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.58k
24.6k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
9.35k
22.32k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.02k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.64k
4.7k (x1.29)
TOTAL
34.55k
56.64k (x1.64)
Multithread
i5-4278U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
47.98k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
44.28k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10k
10.33k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
3.98k (x0.85)
TOTAL
76.18k
106.58k (x1.4)
Performance/W
i5-4278U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1373 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
824 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
2721 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4278U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
5670 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3015 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
11145 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4