Core i5-4278U vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i5-4278U is based on Haswell architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4278U gets a score of 76.2 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 4.4 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4278U gets a score of 76.2 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 4.4 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
860f01
Core
Haswell
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
July 2014
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.55k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.18k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4278U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.58k
15.48k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
9.35k
22.82k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
8.63k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.64k
7.17k (x1.97)
TOTAL
34.55k
54.11k (x1.57)
Multithread
i5-4278U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
117.98k (x3.07)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
146.43k (x6.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10k
65.54k (x6.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
4.77k (x1.03)
TOTAL
76.18k
334.72k (x4.39)
Performance/W
i5-4278U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1373 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
824 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
2721 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4278U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5670 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3015 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
11145 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4