Core i5-4210U vs Xeon X5670
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 2.6 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 2.6 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
206c2
Core
Haswell
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2014
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
8.35k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
5.58k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
3.32k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
3k (x1.03)
TOTAL
23.95k
20.26k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-4210U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
49.72k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
35.19k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
21.88k (x2.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
8.6k (x3.46)
TOTAL
45.22k
115.4k (x2.55)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1169 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1171 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
510 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
3015 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3038 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1322 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1083 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
8872 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4