| | | | | | |

Core i5-4210U vs Pentium N5000


Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the N5000 gets 54.8 k points.

Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
706a1
Core
Haswell
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2014
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
17.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
54.76k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
5.12k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
7.66k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
2.79k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
1.7k (x0.58)
TOTAL
23.95k
17.27k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-4210U

N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
17.56k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
25.71k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
9.45k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
2.05k (x0.82)
TOTAL
45.22k
54.76k (x1.21)

Performance/W
i5-4210U
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
1169 points/W
2927 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1171 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
510 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
341 points/W
TOTAL
3015 points/W
9127 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
1895 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3038 points/GHz
2838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1322 points/GHz
1032 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1083 points/GHz
631 points/GHz
TOTAL
8872 points/GHz
6396 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4