Core i5-4210U vs i3-10100
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
22.74k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
20.31k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
4.71k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
7.65k (x2.81)
TOTAL
27.41k
55.41k (x2.02)
Multithread
i5-4210U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
71.95k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
67.7k (x3.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
16.43k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
6.25k (x2.4)
TOTAL
57.58k
162.33k (x2.82)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4