Core i5-4210U vs Celeron N4120
Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
706a8
Core
Haswell
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2014
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4210U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
9.26k
5.94k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
7.51k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
2.78k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
2.67k (x0.92)
TOTAL
23.95k
18.9k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-4210U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
15.02k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
17.56k
19.77k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.65k
7.71k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.49k
3.67k (x1.48)
TOTAL
45.22k
46.17k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i5-4210U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
1169 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1171 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
510 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
3015 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3038 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1322 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1083 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
8872 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4