| | | | | | |

Core i5-4210U vs A6 9220e


Description
The i5-4210U is based on Haswell architecture while the 9220e is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4210U gets a score of 57.6 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4210U is 2 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
670f00
Core
Haswell
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1169
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2014
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.41k points
22.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.58k points
29.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4210U
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
7.84k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
7.79k
10.54k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
2.27k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
1.7k (x0.63)
TOTAL
27.41k
22.34k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-4210U

9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
28.78k
11.42k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
18.99k
12.58k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.21k
3.62k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.77k (x0.68)
TOTAL
57.58k
29.39k (x0.51)

Performance/W
i5-4210U
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
1919 points/W
1903 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1266 points/W
2097 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
481 points/W
603 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
3839 points/W
4898 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4210U
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
5108 points/GHz
3265 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2884 points/GHz
4390 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1150 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1008 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
9309 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4