Core i5-4200U vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.4 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.4 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
50657
Core
Haswell
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
2 /4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2013
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
16.86k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
12.08k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
3.37k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
6.29k (x2.04)
TOTAL
28.85k
38.61k (x1.34)
Multithread
i5-4200U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
150.99k (x5.46)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
118.54k (x6.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
33.44k (x4.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
8.6k (x1.97)
TOTAL
57.84k
311.57k (x5.39)
Performance/W
i5-4200U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4