| | | | | | |

Core i5-4200U vs i5-6300HQ


Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the i5-6300HQ gets 135.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6300HQ is 2.3 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
506e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/4
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2013
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
40.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
135.14k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
17.99k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
15.61k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
3.56k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3.83k (x1.24)
TOTAL
28.85k
40.99k (x1.42)

Multithread

i5-4200U

i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
64.95k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
54.01k (x2.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
11.9k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
4.29k (x0.98)
TOTAL
57.84k
135.14k (x2.34)

Performance/W
i5-4200U
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
1443 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
1200 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
264 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
3003 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
5622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
4878 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
1113 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
12808 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4