Core i5-4200U vs i5-10210U
Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 2.5 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 2.5 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
806ec
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2013
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
23.11k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
20.58k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
4.73k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
7.43k (x2.41)
TOTAL
28.85k
55.86k (x1.94)
Multithread
i5-4200U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
65.84k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
60.77k (x3.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
14.45k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
4.44k (x1.02)
TOTAL
57.84k
145.51k (x2.52)
Performance/W
i5-4200U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4