Core i5-4200U vs i5-10200H
Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 4.5 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 4.5 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
a0652
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2013
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
26.37k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
23.91k (x3.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
5.57k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
11.68k (x3.78)
TOTAL
28.85k
67.53k (x2.34)
Multithread
i5-4200U
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
114.08k (x4.12)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
114.71k (x6.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
27.33k (x3.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
4.25k (x0.98)
TOTAL
57.84k
260.38k (x4.5)
Performance/W
i5-4200U
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4