Core i5-4200U vs i3-9100T
Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 3.3 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 3.3 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
906eb
Core
Haswell
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2013
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
192.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
24.89k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
21.82k (x2.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
4.83k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
8.63k (x2.79)
TOTAL
28.85k
60.16k (x2.09)
Multithread
i5-4200U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
89.4k (x3.23)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
81.19k (x4.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
18.06k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
4.24k (x0.97)
TOTAL
57.84k
192.88k (x3.33)
Performance/W
i5-4200U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
5511 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4