Core i5-4200U vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 7.5 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 7.5 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
800f82
Core
Haswell
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
June 2013
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
431.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
15.34k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
25.75k (x3.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
5.79k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
17.95k (x5.82)
TOTAL
28.85k
64.83k (x2.25)
Multithread
i5-4200U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
123.07k (x4.45)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
239.3k (x12.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
60.6k (x8.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
8.18k (x1.88)
TOTAL
57.84k
431.14k (x7.45)
Performance/W
i5-4200U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4