Core i5-4200U vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 3.5 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 3.5 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
14.58k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
23.98k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
5.35k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
6.34k (x2.05)
TOTAL
28.85k
50.25k (x1.74)
Multithread
i5-4200U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
57.37k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
107.03k (x5.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
28.9k (x4.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
7.05k (x1.62)
TOTAL
57.84k
200.34k (x3.46)
Performance/W
i5-4200U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4