| | | | | | |

Core i5-4200U vs Ryzen 3 5300U


Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5300U is 3.4 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
860f81
Core
Haswell
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
198.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
15.09k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
23.74k (x3.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
8.32k (x2.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
5.19k (x1.68)
TOTAL
28.85k
52.35k (x1.81)

Multithread

i5-4200U

5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
67k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
89.94k (x4.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
36.84k (x5.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
4.6k (x1.06)
TOTAL
57.84k
198.38k (x3.43)

Performance/W
i5-4200U
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
13226 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4