| | | | | | |

Core i5-4200U vs Ryzen 3 3250U


Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
810f81
Core
Haswell
Dali
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
77.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
9.33k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
17.1k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
3.57k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3.26k (x1.06)
TOTAL
28.85k
33.26k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-4200U

3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
22.14k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
40.04k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
10.71k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
5k (x1.15)
TOTAL
57.84k
77.88k (x1.35)

Performance/W
i5-4200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
5192 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4