Core i5-4200U vs A9 9425
Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the 9425 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4200U is 1.4 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4200U is 1.4 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
670f00
Core
Haswell
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2013
May 2018
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
41.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
11.23k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
14.7k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
3.15k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
2.24k (x0.73)
TOTAL
28.85k
31.31k (x1.09)
Multithread
i5-4200U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
16.58k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
17.84k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
5.09k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
2.23k (x0.51)
TOTAL
57.84k
41.73k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i5-4200U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
148 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
2782 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
3034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
605 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
8461 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4