| | | | | | |

Core i5-3570K vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i5-3570K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3570K gets a score of 79.5 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3570K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
50657
Core
Ivy Bridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
77 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2012
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.57k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
120.16k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3570K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3.85k
1.97k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
10.72k
8.15k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
2.37k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
4.84k (x0.93)
TOTAL
24.6k
17.32k (x0.7)

Multithread

i5-3570K

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
15.73k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
64.78k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.91k
18.06k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
5.21k (x0.74)
TOTAL
79.5k
103.77k (x1.31)

Performance/W
i5-3570K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
522 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
233 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
1032 points/W
1221 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3570K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1012 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2820 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1271 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1371 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
6475 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4