Core i5-3570K vs Ryzen 5 2600
Description
The i5-3570K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3570K gets a score of 79.5 k points while the 2600 gets 177.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-3570K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3570K gets a score of 79.5 k points while the 2600 gets 177.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-3570K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
800f82
Core
Ivy Bridge
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
77 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2012
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
34.57k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
120.16k points
291.53k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3570K
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.85k
3.41k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
10.72k
15.96k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.69k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
17.42k (x3.34)
TOTAL
24.6k
41.47k (x1.69)
Multithread
i5-3570K
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
20.88k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
110.37k (x2.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.91k
39.25k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
6.66k (x0.95)
TOTAL
79.5k
177.16k (x2.23)
Performance/W
i5-3570K
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
321 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
522 points/W
1698 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
233 points/W
604 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
1032 points/W
2726 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3570K
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1012 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2820 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1271 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1371 points/GHz
4466 points/GHz
TOTAL
6475 points/GHz
10633 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4