| | | | | | |

Core i5-3570 vs i3-7100U


Description
The i5-3570 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3570 gets a score of 117.9 k points while the i3-7100U gets 60.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3570 is 1.9 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
77 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
35.01k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.91k points
79.6k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3570
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.72k
8.76k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
12.18k
13.49k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
3.21k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
3.9k (x0.74)
TOTAL
35.01k
29.36k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-3570

i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
48.14k
18.33k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
45.87k
31.08k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.16k
7.5k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
3.61k (x0.63)
TOTAL
117.91k
60.52k (x0.51)

Performance/W
i5-3570
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
625 points/W
1222 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
596 points/W
2072 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
236 points/W
500 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
240 points/W
TOTAL
1531 points/W
4035 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3570
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3347 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3206 points/GHz
5622 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1280 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1381 points/GHz
1624 points/GHz
TOTAL
9213 points/GHz
12235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4