Core i5-3340M vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 338.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.4 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 338.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.4 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306f2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2 /2
12/24
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2013
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
452.9k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
11.18k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
10.06k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
3.21k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
3.12k (x0.69)
TOTAL
31.58k
27.57k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-3340M
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
140.98k (x6.24)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
145.37k (x5.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
45.62k (x4.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
6.75k (x1.59)
TOTAL
62.75k
338.73k (x5.4)
Performance/W
i5-3340M
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
1211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
2823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
3245 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
1007 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
8894 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4