| | | | | | |

Core i5-3340M vs i7-6500U


Description
The i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-6500U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3340M gets a score of 62.8 k points while the i7-6500U gets 78.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6500U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
January 2013
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
31.58k points
46.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
62.75k points
97.52k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3340M
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
11.09k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
11.13k
17.1k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
4.12k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
5.58k (x1.23)
TOTAL
31.58k
37.9k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-3340M

i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
23.3k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
25.49k
38.52k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.42k
9.95k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
6.95k (x1.64)
TOTAL
62.75k
78.72k (x1.25)

Performance/W
i5-3340M
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
645 points/W
1553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
728 points/W
2568 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
663 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
463 points/W
TOTAL
1793 points/W
5248 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3340M
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3384 points/GHz
3579 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3273 points/GHz
5516 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1337 points/GHz
1801 points/GHz
TOTAL
9288 points/GHz
12225 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4