Core i5-3337U vs Xeon W3550
Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the W3550 is based on .
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the W3550 gets 47.1 k points.
Summarizing, the W3550 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the W3550 gets 47.1 k points.
Summarizing, the W3550 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
106a5
Core
Ivy Bridge
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4 /4
TDP
17 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2013
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
73.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
2.3k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
5.21k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.31k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
3.09k (x0.92)
TOTAL
16.42k
13.92k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-3337U
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
8.75k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
19.8k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
12.38k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
6.17k (x1.36)
TOTAL
31.72k
47.09k (x1.48)
Performance/W
i5-3337U
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
296 points/W
67 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
870 points/W
152 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
95 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
267 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
1866 points/W
362 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
944 points/GHz
690 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2682 points/GHz
1564 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1206 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
928 points/GHz
TOTAL
6080 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4