| | | | | | |

Core i5-3337U vs i7-2600


Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-2600 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 48.3 k points while the i7-2600 gets 93.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-2600 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/8
TDP
17 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2013
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
28.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
93.69k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3337U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
8.64k
10.03k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
8.91k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.42k
4.34k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
5.41k (x1.68)
TOTAL
23.82k
28.68k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-3337U

i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.28k
37.69k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
19.67k
34.22k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.59k
17.65k (x2.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
4.13k (x1.1)
TOTAL
48.3k
93.69k (x1.94)

Performance/W
i5-3337U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/W
397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1157 points/W
360 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
186 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
43 points/W
TOTAL
2841 points/W
986 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3201 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
1425 points/GHz
TOTAL
8824 points/GHz
7549 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4