Core i5-3337U vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the G3900TE gets 31.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3337U is 1 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3337U gets a score of 31.7 k points while the G3900TE gets 31.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3337U is 1 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
506e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
17 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2013
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
23.82k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.3k points
49.34k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3337U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
2.36k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
7.24k
9.79k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.08k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
3.36k (x1)
TOTAL
16.42k
18.59k (x1.13)
Multithread
i5-3337U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
5.03k
4.45k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
14.79k
18.16k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
5.48k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
3.5k (x0.77)
TOTAL
31.72k
31.59k (x1)
Performance/W
i5-3337U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
296 points/W
127 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
870 points/W
519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
267 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
1866 points/W
903 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3337U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
944 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2682 points/GHz
4259 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1206 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
6080 points/GHz
8084 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4