| | | | | | |

Core i5-3330 vs i5-2400


Description
The i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3330 gets a score of 104.8 k points while the i5-2400 gets 84.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3330 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-2400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
77 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2012
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
29.84k points
25.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
104.78k points
84.36k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3330
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
10.85k
9.16k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
10.47k
8.2k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
3.95k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.17k (x0.97)
TOTAL
29.84k
25.49k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-3330

i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
41.77k
34.74k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
31.07k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.11k
14.86k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
3.69k (x0.55)
TOTAL
104.78k
84.36k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i5-3330
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
542 points/W
366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
522 points/W
327 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
209 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
1361 points/W
888 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3330
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
2695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3272 points/GHz
2411 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
1228 points/GHz
TOTAL
9325 points/GHz
7497 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4