Core i5-3320M vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 37.9 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 141.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 3.7 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 37.9 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 141.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 3.7 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
50657
Core
Ivy Bridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
311.57k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3320M
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
2.59k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
9.05k
9.5k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
3.15k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
5.9k (x1.5)
TOTAL
20.13k
21.13k (x1.05)
Multithread
i5-3320M
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
6.08k
21.09k (x3.47)
Test#2 (FP)
19.02k
80.93k (x4.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.85k
30.76k (x3.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
8.51k (x2.14)
TOTAL
37.93k
141.3k (x3.72)
Performance/W
i5-3320M
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
174 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
544 points/W
952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
362 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
1084 points/W
1662 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
972 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2742 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1192 points/GHz
1843 points/GHz
TOTAL
6101 points/GHz
6604 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4