Core i5-3320M vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
Both models i5-3320M and E5-2697 v2 are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 10.8 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 10.8 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306e4
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
12 /24
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
June 2012
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
633.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3320M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
3.44k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
9.05k
9.54k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
4.21k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
3.94k (x1)
TOTAL
20.13k
21.13k (x1.05)
Multithread
i5-3320M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
6.08k
73.17k (x12.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.02k
230.83k (x12.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.85k
107.14k (x12.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
7.99k (x2.01)
TOTAL
37.93k
419.12k (x11.05)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3320M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
10.89k
10.64k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
9.77k
9.53k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
4.12k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
3.62k (x0.96)
TOTAL
28.4k
27.91k (x0.98)
Multithread
i5-3320M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
20.23k
252.69k (x12.49)
Test#2 (FP)
20.83k
238.68k (x11.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.49k
115.5k (x12.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
10.98k (x2.72)
TOTAL
54.6k
617.84k (x11.32)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3320M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
10.53k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
10.53k
9.98k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
4k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
3.4k (x0.86)
TOTAL
29.22k
27.92k (x0.96)
Multithread
i5-3320M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
21.27k
247.05k (x11.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23.93k
264.43k (x11.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.48k
111.01k (x11.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
10.66k (x2.59)
TOTAL
58.81k
633.14k (x10.77)
Performance/W
i5-3320M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
608 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
684 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
1680 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3191 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1234 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1203 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
8853 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4