Core i5-3320M vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 277.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 4.7 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 277.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 4.7 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306f2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
35 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2012
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
343.64k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3320M
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
13.1k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
10.53k
11.91k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
4.83k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
3.83k (x0.97)
TOTAL
29.22k
33.68k (x1.15)
Multithread
i5-3320M
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.27k
105.42k (x4.96)
Test#2 (FP)
23.93k
109.99k (x4.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.48k
44.56k (x4.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
17.7k (x4.29)
TOTAL
58.81k
277.66k (x4.72)
Performance/W
i5-3320M
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
608 points/W
781 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
684 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
330 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
1680 points/W
2057 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3191 points/GHz
3309 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1234 points/GHz
1342 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1203 points/GHz
1065 points/GHz
TOTAL
8853 points/GHz
9354 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4