| | | | | | |

Core i5-3320M vs Pentium G2020


Description
Both models i5-3320M and G2020 are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.

"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 54.6 k points while the G2020 gets 42.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.3 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
25.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
42.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3320M
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
2.94k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
9.05k
8.23k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
3.69k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
2.46k (x0.63)
TOTAL
20.13k
17.33k (x0.86)

Multithread

i5-3320M

G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
6.08k
5.54k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.02k
15.47k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.85k
7.06k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
2.99k (x0.75)
TOTAL
37.93k
31.05k (x0.82)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3320M
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
10.89k
9.9k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
9.77k
9.01k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
3.87k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
3.09k (x0.82)
TOTAL
28.4k
25.87k (x0.91)

Multithread

i5-3320M

G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
20.23k
18.83k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.83k
14.15k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.49k
6.61k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
2.81k (x0.7)
TOTAL
54.6k
42.39k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i5-3320M
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
578 points/W
342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
595 points/W
257 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
1560 points/W
771 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
3300 points/GHz
3415 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2960 points/GHz
3107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1205 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1141 points/GHz
1065 points/GHz
TOTAL
8607 points/GHz
8921 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4