Core i5-3320M vs Pentium Gold 5405U
Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 54.6 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.1 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 54.6 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.1 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
806eb
Core
Ivy Bridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2012
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
21.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
48.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3320M
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.89k
7.01k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
9.77k
9.51k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
2.31k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
2.52k (x0.67)
TOTAL
28.4k
21.34k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-3320M
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.23k
16.03k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
20.83k
24.11k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.49k
5.59k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
3.1k (x0.77)
TOTAL
54.6k
48.83k (x0.89)
Performance/W
i5-3320M
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
578 points/W
1069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
595 points/W
1607 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
372 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
207 points/W
TOTAL
1560 points/W
3255 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
3300 points/GHz
3046 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2960 points/GHz
4134 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1205 points/GHz
1004 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1141 points/GHz
1094 points/GHz
TOTAL
8607 points/GHz
9278 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4