| | | | | | |

Core i5-3320M vs Pentium 4415U


Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 54.6 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 4415U is 1 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2012
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
56.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3320M
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
2.34k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
9.05k
9.51k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
3.05k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
2.59k (x0.66)
TOTAL
20.13k
17.49k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-3320M

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.08k
4.71k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
19.02k
21.73k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.85k
7.35k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
2.43k (x0.61)
TOTAL
37.93k
36.22k (x0.95)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3320M
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.89k
8.29k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
9.77k
11.82k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
3.09k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
4.18k (x1.11)
TOTAL
28.4k
27.39k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-3320M

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.23k
17.24k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
20.83k
27.4k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.49k
7.44k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
4.31k (x1.07)
TOTAL
54.6k
56.39k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i5-3320M
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
578 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
595 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
1560 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3300 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2960 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1205 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1141 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
8607 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4