Core i5-3320M vs m7-6Y75
Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2012
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3320M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
10.24k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
10.53k
15.33k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
2.97k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
5.32k (x1.34)
TOTAL
29.22k
33.86k (x1.16)
Multithread
i5-3320M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
21.27k
16.78k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23.93k
25.09k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.48k
6.14k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
5.58k (x1.35)
TOTAL
58.81k
53.58k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i5-3320M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
608 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
684 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
1680 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3191 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1234 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1203 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
8853 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4