Core i5-3320M vs i7-6700HQ
Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the i7-6700HQ gets 145.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 2.5 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the i7-6700HQ gets 145.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 2.5 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
506e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-H
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
50.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
205.24k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3320M
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
11.23k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
10.53k
16.98k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
4.21k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
7.07k (x1.78)
TOTAL
29.22k
39.49k (x1.35)
Multithread
i5-3320M
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
21.27k
44.59k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.93k
75.02k (x3.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.48k
20.15k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
5.92k (x1.44)
TOTAL
58.81k
145.68k (x2.48)
Performance/W
i5-3320M
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
608 points/W
991 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
684 points/W
1667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
1680 points/W
3237 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
3208 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3191 points/GHz
4853 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1234 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1203 points/GHz
2021 points/GHz
TOTAL
8853 points/GHz
11284 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4