| | | | | | |

Core i5-3320M vs i5-9300H


Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 37.9 k points while the i5-9300H gets 80.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 2.1 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
906ea
Core
Ivy Bridge
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
244.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3320M
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
3.38k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
9.05k
12.84k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
4.6k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
6.23k (x1.58)
TOTAL
20.13k
27.05k (x1.34)

Multithread

i5-3320M

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.08k
11.6k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.02k
48.01k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.85k
17.05k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.88k (x0.98)
TOTAL
37.93k
80.54k (x2.12)

Performance/W
i5-3320M
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
174 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
544 points/W
1067 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
379 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
1084 points/W
1790 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
972 points/GHz
824 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2742 points/GHz
3132 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1192 points/GHz
1519 points/GHz
TOTAL
6101 points/GHz
6597 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4