Core i5-3320M vs i5-8400
Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-8400 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 37.9 k points while the i5-8400 gets 139 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 3.7 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 37.9 k points while the i5-8400 gets 139 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 3.7 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
906ea
Core
Ivy Bridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
9216 kB
Date
June 2012
September 2017
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
64.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
289.61k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3320M
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
4.08k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
9.05k
14.96k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
4.98k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
10.29k (x2.62)
TOTAL
20.13k
34.31k (x1.7)
Multithread
i5-3320M
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
6.08k
21.54k (x3.54)
Test#2 (FP)
19.02k
85.13k (x4.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.85k
28.24k (x3.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.08k (x1.03)
TOTAL
37.93k
139k (x3.66)
Performance/W
i5-3320M
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
174 points/W
331 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
544 points/W
1310 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
63 points/W
TOTAL
1084 points/W
2138 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
972 points/GHz
1021 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2742 points/GHz
3739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1192 points/GHz
2573 points/GHz
TOTAL
6101 points/GHz
8578 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4