Core i5-3320M vs i5-3317U
Description
Both models i5-3320M and i5-3317U are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the i5-3317U gets 41.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.4 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the i5-3317U gets 41.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.4 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
35 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
17.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
41.31k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3320M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
2.5k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
9.05k
7.18k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
3.19k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
3.41k (x0.87)
TOTAL
20.13k
16.27k (x0.81)
Multithread
i5-3320M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.08k
4.93k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
19.02k
15.72k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.85k
7.53k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.21k (x1.06)
TOTAL
37.93k
32.39k (x0.85)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3320M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.89k
8.38k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
9.77k
7.76k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
3.33k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
3.41k (x0.91)
TOTAL
28.4k
22.88k (x0.81)
Multithread
i5-3320M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.23k
16.56k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
20.83k
16.79k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.49k
7.85k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
4.02k (x0.99)
TOTAL
54.6k
45.23k (x0.83)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3320M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
6.11k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
10.53k
6.58k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
2.48k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
2.71k (x0.68)
TOTAL
29.22k
17.88k (x0.61)
Multithread
i5-3320M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.27k
13.67k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
23.93k
16.8k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.48k
6.66k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
4.17k (x1.01)
TOTAL
58.81k
41.31k (x0.7)
Performance/W
i5-3320M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
608 points/W
804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
684 points/W
988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
392 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
1680 points/W
2430 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
2351 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3191 points/GHz
2532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1234 points/GHz
953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1203 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
8853 points/GHz
6879 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4