| | | | | | |

Core i5-3320M vs i3-2330M


Description
The i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-2330M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3320M gets a score of 58.8 k points while the i3-2330M gets 33.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.8 times faster than the i3-2330M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
29.22k points
16.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.81k points
33.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3320M
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
5.61k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
10.53k
5.42k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
2.45k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
2.53k (x0.64)
TOTAL
29.22k
16.02k (x0.55)

Multithread

i5-3320M

i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
21.27k
11.99k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
23.93k
11.42k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.48k
5.8k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
4.07k (x0.99)
TOTAL
58.81k
33.28k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i5-3320M
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
608 points/W
343 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
684 points/W
326 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
1680 points/W
951 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3320M
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3191 points/GHz
2465 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1234 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1203 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
8853 points/GHz
7281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4