Core i5-3317U vs Pentium E6600
Description
The i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 1.5 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 1.5 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
1067a
Core
Ivy Bridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
17 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
June 2012
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
16.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.31k points
29.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3317U
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
8.38k
3.57k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
7.76k
7.85k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
3.14k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
1.58k (x0.46)
TOTAL
22.88k
16.14k (x0.71)
Multithread
i5-3317U
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
6.99k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
16.79k
14.66k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.85k
6.09k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.02k
1.66k (x0.41)
TOTAL
45.23k
29.4k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i5-3317U
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
974 points/W
108 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
988 points/W
226 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
94 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
237 points/W
26 points/W
TOTAL
2660 points/W
452 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3317U
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2984 points/GHz
2561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
1023 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1311 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
TOTAL
8801 points/GHz
5263 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4