| | | | | | |

Core i5-3317U vs i3-540


Description
The i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-540 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 45.2 k points while the i3-540 gets 38.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-540 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
20655
Core
Ivy Bridge
Clarkdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
17 W
73 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2012
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
18.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.31k points
38.86k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3317U
i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
8.38k
7.65k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
7.76k
5.14k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
3.06k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
2.42k (x0.71)
TOTAL
22.88k
18.27k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-3317U

i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
16.21k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
16.79k
12.04k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.85k
8.28k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.02k
2.33k (x0.58)
TOTAL
45.23k
38.86k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i5-3317U
i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
974 points/W
222 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
988 points/W
165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
237 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
2660 points/W
532 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3317U
i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
3225 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2984 points/GHz
1676 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
999 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1311 points/GHz
789 points/GHz
TOTAL
8801 points/GHz
5958 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4