| | | |

Core i5-3210M vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 37.9 k points while the 4110 gets 156.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 4.1 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
50654
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
2 /2
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
11264 kB
Date
Jun 2012
July 2017

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3210M
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3083
2995 (-2.83%)
Test#2 (FP)
8582
12285 (43.15%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3762
3636 (-3.36%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3989
6545 (64.08%)
TOTAL
19416
25461 (31.14%)

Multithread

i5-3210M

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5787
20421 (252.90%)
Test#2 (FP)
18774
95833 (410.46%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8741
30881 (253.29%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4588
9696 (111.33%)
TOTAL
37890
156831 (313.92%)

Performance/W
i5-3210M
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
165 points/W
240 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
536 points/W
1127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
250 points/W
363 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
1083 points/W
1845 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2768 points/GHz
4095 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
1212 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1287 points/GHz
2182 points/GHz
TOTAL
6263 points/GHz
8487 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8